![]() ![]() In the 1990s, we corresponded with the executive editor of the Old Testament portion of the NKJV, Dr. This says to me that the translators and producers of the NKJV are committed to the same text as that underlying the King James Bible, but this is not the case as we will see. “Not to add to, take from, nor alter the communication intended by the original translators, but to convey that communication in 20th century vocabulary and usage.” The Statement of Purpose issued by Thomas Nelson, publishers of the New King James Bible New Testament (1979), makes the following claim: The advertisements for the NKJV would have readers believe that there are no textual changes and that the men who produced it love the old King James Bible. The editors and translators of the NKJV claim that they are standing in the tradition of the men who originally produced the Authorized Version and who slightly revised it in the 18th century, that they are only updating outmoded language and that they remain firmly committed to the same Greek and Hebrew text as that underlying the original King James Bible. THE NEW KING JAMES VERSION (NKJV) IS A DECEPTION. Yet I cannot recommend the NKJV for the following reasons. As missionaries in South Asia, we have worked closely with such people for many years and many personal friends fall into this category, and the difficulty they have with the King James is very real. I wish we could recommend it, because I have great sympathy with the plight of those who read English as a second language and have trouble with the antiquation of the King James. T he NKJV is the best of the modern versions, since it is not based on the critical Greek text.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |